AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L
AEJL.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E) and IKOR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - AEJL.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while IKOR.L is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AEJL.L returned 68.73%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for IKOR.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IKOR.L.
Performance
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEJL.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly lower than IKOR.L's 66.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AEJL.L has outperformed IKOR.L with an annualized return of 68.73%, while IKOR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.
AEJL.L
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 68.73%
IKOR.L
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -23.11%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- YTD
- 66.09%
- 1Y
- 133.23%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEJL.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E | 15.41% | 20.45% | 11.91% | 0.03% | -8.06% | -2.60% | 18.01% | 10,128.27% | -10.40% | 19.27% |
IKOR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) | 66.09% | 85.96% | -21.55% | 13.31% | -19.76% | -7.30% | 39.09% | 6.89% | -16.49% | 32.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEJL.L and IKOR.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, AEJL.L and IKOR.L have become more correlated (0.83) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Technology
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Financial Services
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Consumer Cyclical
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Industrials
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Basic Materials
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Communication Services
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Healthcare
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Energy
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Consumer Defensive
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Real Estate
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
-
Utilities
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank
AEJL.L
IKOR.L
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEJL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.97 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 16.68 | -9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEJL.L drawdown since its inception was -55.23%, smaller than the maximum IKOR.L drawdown of -77.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEJL.L and IKOR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEJL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.23% | -77.32% | +22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -26.67% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.13% | -28.58% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.10% | -39.33% | +17.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.13% | -44.11% | +15.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.63% | -26.67% | +14.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -27.31% | +14.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 7.96% | -4.21% |
Volatility
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) is 8.93%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) has a volatility of 18.91%. This indicates that AEJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEJL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 18.91% | -9.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 39.53% | -22.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.33% | 43.42% | -24.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 27.36% | -8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,741.82% | 25.50% | +2,716.32% |
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IKOR.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEJL.L vs. IKOR.L - Dividend Comparison
AEJL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEJL.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IKOR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.52% | 0.83% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.76% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 0.72% | 0.57% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEJL.L and IKOR.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEJL.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEJL.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IKOR.L.
AEJL.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IKOR.L is South Korea Equities. AEJL.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while IKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AEJL.L and 0.74% for IKOR.L.
Find the right allocation for AEJL.L and IKOR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer