PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEJL.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly lower than HKOR.L's 66.72% return. Over the past 10 years, AEJL.L has outperformed HKOR.L with an annualized return of 68.73%, while HKOR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.87% annualized return.


AEJL.L

1D
-2.72%
1M
-9.91%
6M
9.63%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
68.73%

HKOR.L

1D
-1.47%
1M
-23.43%
6M
44.96%
YTD
66.72%
1Y
133.06%
3Y*
35.54%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEJL.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E
15.41%20.45%11.91%0.03%-8.06%-2.60%18.01%10,128.27%-10.40%19.27%
HKOR.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD
66.72%86.42%-21.81%13.46%-19.95%-7.35%40.21%7.12%-16.80%32.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AEJL.L and HKOR.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2011

0.64

The correlation between AEJL.L and HKOR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AEJL.L
HKOR.L

Technology

43.1%
61.3%

Financial Services

18.7%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
6.7%

Industrials

7.2%
15.4%

Basic Materials

5.5%
1.6%

Communication Services

5.5%
2.2%

Healthcare

2.9%
2.4%

Energy

2.5%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.7%
0.3%

Technology

AEJL.L
43.1%
HKOR.L
61.3%

Financial Services

AEJL.L
18.7%
HKOR.L
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AEJL.L
8.8%
HKOR.L
6.7%

Industrials

AEJL.L
7.2%
HKOR.L
15.4%

Basic Materials

AEJL.L
5.5%
HKOR.L
1.6%

Communication Services

AEJL.L
5.5%
HKOR.L
2.2%

Healthcare

AEJL.L
2.9%
HKOR.L
2.4%

Energy

AEJL.L
2.5%
HKOR.L
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

AEJL.L
2.3%
HKOR.L
1.2%

Real Estate

AEJL.L
1.9%
HKOR.L

-

Utilities

AEJL.L
1.7%
HKOR.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEJL.L
AEJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AEJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AEJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

HKOR.L
HKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEJL.LHKOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.94

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

16.76

-9.47

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEJL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the HKOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEJL.L and HKOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEJL.L drawdown since its inception was -55.23%, roughly equal to the maximum HKOR.L drawdown of -56.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEJL.L and HKOR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEJL.LHKOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.23%

-56.04%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-26.76%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-29.09%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.10%

-39.36%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

-44.41%

+16.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.63%

-26.76%

+14.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-28.33%

+16.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

7.91%

-4.16%

Volatility

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) is 8.93%, while HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) has a volatility of 19.52%. This indicates that AEJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEJL.LHKOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

19.52%

-10.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

39.48%

-22.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

43.31%

-23.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

27.38%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,741.82%

25.26%

+2,716.56%

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HKOR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEJL.L vs. HKOR.L - Dividend Comparison

AEJL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AEJL.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HKOR.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD
0.44%0.69%1.51%1.11%0.71%0.59%0.02%0.29%0.14%0.11%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEJL.L and HKOR.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HKOR.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HKOR.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for AEJL.L.

AEJL.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HKOR.L is South Korea Equities. AEJL.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while HKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AEJL.L and 0.50% for HKOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEJL.L and HKOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer