AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

AEJL.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E) and CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AEJL.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AEJL.L returned 68.73%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for CSH2.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. AEJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH2.L.

Performance

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEJL.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AEJL.L has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 68.73%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.12% annualized return.

AEJL.L

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -9.91%
• 6M: 9.63%
• YTD: 15.41%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 6.34%
• 10Y*: 68.73%

CSH2.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 2.05%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 1Y: 4.33%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 3.76%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AEJL.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E	15.41%	20.45%	11.91%	0.03%	-8.06%	-2.60%	18.01%	10,128.27%	-10.40%	19.27%
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	2.24%	4.67%	5.61%	4.72%	1.54%	0.13%	0.30%	0.82%	0.70%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between AEJL.L and CSH2.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	-0.03

Return for Risk

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEJL.L

AEJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
AEJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
AEJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AEJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AEJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
AEJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CSH2.L

CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEJL.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	8.86	-7.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	16.69	-14.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	5.38	-4.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	27.35	-25.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.29	175.24	-167.95

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEJL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 8.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEJL.L and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEJL.L drawdown since its inception was -55.23%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEJL.L and CSH2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEJL.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.23%	-0.37%	-54.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.63%	-0.16%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.13%	-0.29%	-16.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.10%	-0.29%	-21.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.13%	-0.37%	-27.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.63%	0.00%	-12.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-0.00%	-12.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	0.02%	+3.73%

Volatility

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan C-E (AEJL.L) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) at 0.05%. This indicates that AEJL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEJL.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.93%	0.05%	+8.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.23%	0.19%	+17.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.33%	0.49%	+18.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	0.56%	+18.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,741.82%	0.44%	+2,741.38%

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEJL.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AEJL.L nor CSH2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEJL.L and CSH2.L in my portfolio?

AEJL.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEJL.L or CSH2.L?

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEJL.L or CSH2.L?

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for AEJL.L.

What is the main difference between AEJL.L and CSH2.L?

AEJL.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. AEJL.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while CSH2.L tracks SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AEJL.L and 0.10% for CSH2.L.