PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEIS vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEIS vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEIS achieves a 36.63% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.


AEIS

1D
-5.30%
1M
-18.42%
6M
11.18%
YTD
36.63%
1Y
105.42%
3Y*
33.85%
5Y*
24.79%
10Y*
22.13%

NRGU

1D
3.84%
1M
18.77%
6M
86.19%
YTD
118.00%
1Y
119.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEIS vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AEIS and NRGU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.05

The correlation between AEIS and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEIS vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEIS
AEIS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AEIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AEIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEIS vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEISNRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

2.73

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

6.13

+5.98

AEIS vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEIS and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEIS vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEIS drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEIS and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEISNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-57.50%

-35.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.49%

-43.89%

+17.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.49%

-24.81%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.18%

-26.06%

-26.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.74%

19.53%

-10.79%

Volatility

AEIS vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) have volatilities of 23.95% and 23.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEISNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.95%

23.48%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.63%

63.97%

-17.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.74%

76.98%

-20.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.41%

89.07%

-44.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.11%

89.07%

-43.96%

Dividends

AEIS vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

AEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
0.14%0.19%0.35%0.37%0.47%0.44%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEIS and NRGU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEIS has higher volatility (23.95%) compared to NRGU (23.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEIS dropped -92.51% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

AEIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEIS and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer