AEHR vs. NVDA
AEHR (Aehr Test Systems) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AEHR in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, NVDA in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, AEHR returned 45.82%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AEHR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEHR achieves a 296.14% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, AEHR has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 45.82%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.
AEHR
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- 6M
- 211.93%
- YTD
- 296.14%
- 1Y
- 373.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 70.08%
- 10Y*
- 45.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $231.69M | $269.50M | $230.50M | |
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B |
AEHR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEHR Aehr Test Systems | 296.14% | 21.41% | -37.32% | 31.99% | -16.87% | 855.73% | 26.50% | 41.84% | -47.97% | 12.45% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEHR and NVDA is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, AEHR and NVDA have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AEHR:
$2.61B
NVDA:
$4.86T
AEHR:
-$0.23
NVDA:
$6.53
AEHR:
49.52
NVDA:
19.35
AEHR:
12.09
NVDA:
25.05
AEHR:
$50.00M
NVDA:
$253.49B
AEHR:
$17.65M
NVDA:
$187.95B
AEHR:
-$10.85M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEHR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
AEHR
NVDA
AEHR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEHR | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.09 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.57 | 0.65 | +7.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.93 | 1.32 | +16.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEHR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEHR drawdown since its inception was -97.98%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEHR and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEHR | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.98% | -89.72% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.90% | -20.21% | -23.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.16% | -36.88% | -50.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.37% | -66.34% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.37% | -66.34% | -21.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.39% | -14.74% | -16.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.35% | -36.07% | -43.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.94% | 9.90% | +11.04% |
Volatility
AEHR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a higher volatility of 50.37% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that AEHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEHR | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.37% | 12.04% | +38.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.99% | 28.30% | +71.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 125.91% | 36.41% | +89.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.69% | 51.87% | +50.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.34% | 49.95% | +45.39% |
Dividends
AEHR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
AEHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEHR Aehr Test Systems | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
AEHR vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aehr Test Systems and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEHR vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
AEHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 8.02M and revenue of 18.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
AEHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -987.00K and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
AEHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of 1.39M and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEHR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEHR has higher volatility (50.37%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEHR dropped -97.98% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEHR and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer