PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AE50.DE achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than XCO2.DE's 1.63% return.


AE50.DE

1D
0.71%
1M
3.13%
YTD
11.24%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
10.59%

XCO2.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.90%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AE50.DE
Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR
11.24%18.08%7.63%14.90%-1.62%26.03%-6.38%7.11%
XCO2.DE
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
1.63%1.12%4.38%5.87%-15.35%-2.28%3.83%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between AE50.DE and XCO2.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.12

Over the past year, AE50.DE and XCO2.DE have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AE50.DE
AE50.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AE50.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XCO2.DE
XCO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AE50.DEXCO2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.20

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

3.72

+5.66

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AE50.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the XCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AE50.DE and XCO2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AE50.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.20%, which is greater than XCO2.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AE50.DE and XCO2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AE50.DEXCO2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.20%

-17.88%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-2.33%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-2.47%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.29%

-17.24%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.75%

+6.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-8.53%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.76%

+1.85%

Volatility

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) at 0.92%. This indicates that AE50.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AE50.DEXCO2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

0.92%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

2.11%

+8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

2.66%

+10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

4.88%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

5.24%

+9.63%

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AE50.DE and XCO2.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AE50.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AE50.DE nor XCO2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AE50.DE and XCO2.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE50.DE and XCO2.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

AE50.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XCO2.DE is Global Corporate Bonds. AE50.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 50, while XCO2.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AE50.DE and XCO2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer