AE50.DE vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
AE50.DE and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AE50.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 50. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both AE50.DE and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AE50.DE or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between AE50.DE and SCHG is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AE50.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AE50.DE:
0.99
SCHG:
2.05
AE50.DE:
1.42
SCHG:
2.68
AE50.DE:
1.17
SCHG:
1.37
AE50.DE:
1.44
SCHG:
2.91
AE50.DE:
4.10
SCHG:
11.49
AE50.DE:
2.61%
SCHG:
3.13%
AE50.DE:
10.67%
SCHG:
17.49%
AE50.DE:
-32.20%
SCHG:
-34.59%
AE50.DE:
-3.42%
SCHG:
-3.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AE50.DE achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 35.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AE50.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.21%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
AE50.DE
10.18%
3.03%
-1.84%
10.74%
8.42%
11.21%
SCHG
35.44%
3.33%
10.58%
35.25%
19.99%
16.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AE50.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AE50.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AE50.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AE50.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
AE50.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE50.DE Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
AE50.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AE50.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.20%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AE50.DE and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AE50.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) is 2.59%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that AE50.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.