PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AE50.DE having a 7.47% return and H4ZA.DE slightly lower at 7.24%. Over the past 10 years, AE50.DE has underperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 9.32%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.


AE50.DE

1D
0.82%
1M
3.36%
YTD
7.47%
6M
9.70%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
9.32%

H4ZA.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.63%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AE50.DE
Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.47%18.08%7.63%14.90%-1.62%26.03%-6.38%28.61%-10.46%9.34%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.24%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.07%-11.96%10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AE50.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014

0.91

The correlation between AE50.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AE50.DE
AE50.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AE50.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AE50.DEH4ZA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.43

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

4.85

+1.30

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AE50.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AE50.DE and H4ZA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AE50.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.98

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AE50.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.20%, smaller than the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AE50.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AE50.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.20%

-38.41%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-10.97%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-16.40%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.29%

-23.26%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.20%

-38.41%

+6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.50%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-7.84%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.24%

-0.53%

Volatility

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) is 4.34%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that AE50.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AE50.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.95%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

12.99%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

15.99%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

17.50%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

18.17%

-3.06%

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AE50.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AE50.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

AE50.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AE50.DE
Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.44%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AE50.DE and H4ZA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AE50.DE.

AE50.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 50, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AE50.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AE50.DE and H4ZA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer