ADVNX vs. BRW
ADVNX (North Square Strategic Income Fund) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ADVNX returned 4.05%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for BRW. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ADVNX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.
Performance
ADVNX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADVNX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.83% return.
ADVNX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.89%
BRW
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ADVNX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVNX North Square Strategic Income Fund | 1.65% | 11.20% | 9.71% | 5.07% | -8.43% | 3.26% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.83% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADVNX and BRW is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ADVNX and BRW shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADVNX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank
ADVNX
BRW
ADVNX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Strategic Income Fund (ADVNX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADVNX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 0.23 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 0.42 | +7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADVNX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 0.31 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.56 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.59 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
ADVNX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADVNX drawdown since its inception was -11.86%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVNX and BRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADVNX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.86% | -17.74% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -17.74% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.22% | -17.74% | +12.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.86% | -17.74% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -8.51% | +7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -3.93% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 9.86% | -8.98% |
Volatility
ADVNX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Square Strategic Income Fund (ADVNX) is 1.22%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that ADVNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADVNX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 2.28% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 7.54% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 13.20% | -9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 12.86% | -8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 12.86% | -9.10% |
ADVNX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADVNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADVNX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison
ADVNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than BRW's 14.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVNX North Square Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.73% | 4.02% | 4.38% | 2.80% | 5.23% | 6.80% | 3.33% | 3.92% | 4.09% | 4.19% | 6.30% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 14.89% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADVNX and BRW have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to ADVNX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVNX dropped -11.86% vs BRW's -17.74%.
ADVNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADVNX and BRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer