PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVMX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVMX achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ADVMX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.72% annualized return.


ADVMX

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.23%
YTD
14.22%
6M
16.57%
1Y
50.27%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
8.86%

COBYX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.49%
YTD
10.00%
6M
12.07%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
4.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADVMX
Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
14.22%45.69%-2.43%16.20%-11.69%9.81%10.81%7.15%-18.47%25.07%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
10.00%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVMX and COBYX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.51

The correlation between ADVMX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVMX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVMX
ADVMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ADVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVMXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

1.16

+1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

1.76

+1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.21

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

1.76

+2.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.10

5.26

+9.84

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVMX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVMXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.16

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.35

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.39

+0.03

Drawdowns

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVMX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVMX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVMXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-34.18%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-8.95%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-16.29%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-17.10%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.17%

-34.18%

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-1.78%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-6.80%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.99%

+0.24%

Volatility

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.71%. This indicates that ADVMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVMXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.71%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

9.46%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

11.79%

+7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

13.98%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

13.64%

+2.47%

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADVMX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

ADVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than COBYX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVMX
Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
9.33%10.65%0.00%0.95%1.13%1.51%1.51%2.84%1.48%3.06%2.18%1.89%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.07%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVMX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADVMX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to COBYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVMX dropped -51.17% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

ADVMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVMX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer