PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVE vs. VNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADVE vs. VNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADVE vs. VNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
8.02%26.12%7.02%5.13%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
-8.75%66.55%-11.15%-3.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than VNM's -8.75% return.


ADVE

1D
1.36%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
8.02%
6M
11.53%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VNM

1D
0.58%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-8.75%
6M
-3.29%
1Y
38.90%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADVE vs. VNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VNM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ADVE vs. VNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVE vs. VNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVEVNMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.19

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

1.71

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.97

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.49

5.86

+5.63

ADVE vs. VNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the VNM Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and VNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVEVNMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.19

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

-0.03

+1.26

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and VNM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ADVE vs. VNM - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than VNM's 0.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.76%2.97%6.00%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.22%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. VNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum VNM drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and VNM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVEVNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-63.19%

+44.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-20.24%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-28.93%

+21.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-37.98%

+34.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

6.79%

-3.81%

Volatility

ADVE vs. VNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) is 8.13%, while VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that ADVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADVEVNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

9.09%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

20.05%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

32.91%

-15.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

24.04%

-8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

23.37%

-8.25%