ADVE vs. EEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ADVE (Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF) and EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. ADVE is actively managed, while EEMX is passively managed. Over the past year, ADVE returned 41.86% vs 58.43% for EEMX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ADVE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EEMX.

Performance

ADVE vs. EEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 21.50% return, which is significantly lower than EEMX's 28.94% return.

ADVE

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 21.50%
• 6M: 23.40%
• 1Y: 41.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 9.99%
• YTD: 28.94%
• 6M: 32.20%
• 1Y: 58.43%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVE vs. EEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	21.50%	26.12%	7.02%	5.13%
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	28.94%	35.23%	7.22%	6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and EEMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023	0.89

The correlation between ADVE and EEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADVE vs. EEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADVE	EEMX
Technology	29.0%	38.7%
Financial Services	27.3%	20.7%
Industrials	13.6%	7.6%
Communication Services	9.5%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	10.1%
Real Estate	4.0%	1.1%
Basic Materials	3.4%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.2%
Energy	1.2%	0.5%
Utilities	1.1%	1.5%
Healthcare	1.1%	3.0%

Return for Risk

ADVE vs. EEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVE

ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 76
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

EEMX

EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 82
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVE vs. EEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADVE	EEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.83	-0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.63	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.51	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	4.23	-0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.23	16.72	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADVE vs. EEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the EEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and EEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADVE	EEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.83	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	0.48	+0.96

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. EEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum EEMX drawdown of -39.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and EEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADVE	EEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-39.90%	+21.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-13.89%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.64%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.31%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-14.74%	+11.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.51%	-0.56%

Volatility

ADVE vs. EEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) is 5.98%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that ADVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADVE	EEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	8.88%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	18.19%	-3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	20.74%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	19.15%	-3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	20.22%	-4.54%

ADVE vs. EEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMX's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADVE vs. EEMX - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than EEMX's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	2.46%	2.97%	6.00%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	1.75%	2.28%	2.26%	2.20%	2.38%	1.72%	1.42%	2.57%	2.41%	2.45%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADVE and EEMX in my portfolio?

ADVE and EEMX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADVE or EEMX?

EEMX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to ADVE (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVE dropped -18.41% vs EEMX's -39.90%.

Which ETF is better, ADVE or EEMX?

On 1-year performance, EEMX leads with 58.43% vs 41.86% for ADVE. On fees, EEMX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ADVE has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADVE or EEMX?

Over the 1-year period, EEMX has performed better with a 58.43% return vs 41.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADVE or EEMX?

EEMX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADVE or EEMX?

ADVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.75% for EEMX.

What is the main difference between ADVE and EEMX?

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADVE and 0.30% for EEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.