ADVDX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
ADVDX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Sep 21, 2003. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVDX abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund | -1.55% | 20.33% | 7.74% | 13.35% | -13.36% | 16.80% | 10.33% | 25.43% | -9.57% | 23.36% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADVDX achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ADVDX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.45%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
ADVDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADVDX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ADVDX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
ADVDX
CSUAX
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADVDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.63 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.17 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.36 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 10.32 | -3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADVDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.63 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.50 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ADVDX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
ADVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVDX abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund | 8.77% | 8.53% | 5.59% | 5.70% | 6.09% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 5.70% | 6.72% | 5.73% | 6.65% | 6.67% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADVDX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVDX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADVDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -52.20% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -7.98% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -20.45% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.33% | -35.05% | -1.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -4.38% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -8.49% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.83% | +0.46% |
Volatility
ADVDX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that ADVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ADVDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 3.26% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.33% | 6.89% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 11.48% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 12.89% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 14.89% | +1.05% |