PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADSK vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADSK vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADSK achieves a -22.44% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's 4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ADSK has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 14.69%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.


ADSK

1D
-2.98%
1M
-7.25%
YTD
-22.44%
6M
-25.27%
1Y
-23.34%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
-4.22%
10Y*
14.69%

IBM

1D
-7.17%
1M
34.16%
YTD
4.53%
6M
2.32%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
36.49%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADSK vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
-22.44%0.15%21.39%30.29%-33.54%-7.91%66.43%42.65%22.68%41.64%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
4.53%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ADSK and IBM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADSK:

$48.68B

IBM:

$290.99B

EPS

ADSK:

$6.84

IBM:

$11.32

PE Ratio

ADSK:

33.58

IBM:

27.00

PEG Ratio

ADSK:

1.29

IBM:

0.32

PS Ratio

ADSK:

6.55

IBM:

4.21

PB Ratio

ADSK:

15.26

IBM:

8.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADSK:

$7.51B

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADSK:

$6.84B

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADSK:

$2.14B

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADSK vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADSK
ADSK Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ADSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADSK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ADSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADSK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADSK vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADSKIBMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.72

0.47

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.87

0.91

-1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.13

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

0.59

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.37

1.29

-2.66

ADSK vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADSK Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADSK and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADSKIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

0.47

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.80

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.46

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.30

+0.03

Drawdowns

ADSK vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADSK drawdown since its inception was -76.92%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADSK and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADSKIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.92%

-69.40%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.15%

-30.96%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.15%

-30.96%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.99%

-30.96%

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.99%

-40.59%

-11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.92%

-7.17%

-25.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.62%

-20.12%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.01%

14.16%

+2.85%

Volatility

ADSK vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) is 12.66%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 20.58%. This indicates that ADSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADSKIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.66%

20.58%

-7.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.80%

34.08%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

38.99%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.08%

27.03%

+8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.42%

26.51%

+9.91%

Dividends

ADSK vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

ADSK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.20%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%

Financials

ADSK vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autodesk, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.93B
15.92B
(ADSK) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADSK vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autodesk, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
91.0%
56.2%
Portfolio components
ADSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

ADSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported an operating income of 541.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

ADSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADSK and IBM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (20.58%) compared to ADSK (12.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADSK dropped -76.92% vs IBM's -69.40%.

IBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADSK and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer