ADPV vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADPV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Adaptiv, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. ADPV is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, ADPV returned 39.30% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

ADPV vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADPV achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

ADPV

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 39.30%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPV vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	10.73%	16.56%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPV and RBIL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

ADPV vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPV

ADPV Risk / Return Rank: 47
ADPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ADPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ADPV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ADPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ADPV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPV vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADPV	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	5.01	-3.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	7.92	-5.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	2.39	-1.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	17.00	-14.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	70.66	-62.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADPV vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPV and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADPV	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	5.01	-3.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	4.28	-3.30

Drawdowns

ADPV vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADPV	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.30%	-0.50%	-21.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-0.27%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-0.06%	-5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	0.07%	+4.61%

Volatility

ADPV vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that ADPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADPV	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	0.30%	+5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.94%	0.79%	+16.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.10%	0.92%	+23.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	1.05%	+19.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.84%	1.05%	+19.79%

ADPV vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADPV vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	0.63%	0.70%	0.67%	0.22%	0.25%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADPV and RBIL in my portfolio?

ADPV and RBIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADPV or RBIL?

ADPV has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPV dropped -22.30% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, ADPV or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, ADPV leads with 39.30% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADPV or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, ADPV has performed better with a 39.30% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADPV or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADPV or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.63% for ADPV.

What is the main difference between ADPV and RBIL?

ADPV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.