ADPV vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ADPV returned 26.59%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for BDGS. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

ADPV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADPV achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.21% return.

ADPV

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 34.24%
• 3Y*: 26.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPV vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	11.09%	21.19%	43.88%	7.64%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPV and BDGS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.51

The correlation between ADPV and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADPV vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADPV	BDGS
Technology	22.3%	37.4%
Energy	20.7%	2.6%
Healthcare	11.5%	7.5%
Basic Materials	11.5%	1.5%
Financial Services	11.0%	9.3%
Real Estate	7.9%	1.5%
Communication Services	7.4%	16.6%
Industrials	7.0%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	10.9%
Utilities	3.4%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

ADPV vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPV

ADPV Risk / Return Rank: 43
ADPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ADPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ADPV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ADPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ADPV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ADPV	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.84	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.75	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.90	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	12.72	-5.42

ADPV vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPV and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ADPV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADPV	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.30%	-9.12%	-13.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-4.03%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.30%	-9.12%	-13.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-2.17%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-0.66%	-4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.70%	0.92%	+3.78%

Volatility

ADPV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that ADPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADPV	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.84%	2.30%	+5.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.59%	5.17%	+12.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.88%	6.38%	+18.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	8.22%	+12.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	8.22%	+12.80%

ADPV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADPV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	0.63%	0.70%	0.67%	0.22%	0.25%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADPV and BDGS in my portfolio?

ADPV and BDGS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADPV or BDGS?

ADPV has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPV dropped -22.30% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, ADPV or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, ADPV leads with 26.59% vs 13.42% for BDGS. On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADPV or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, ADPV has performed better with a 26.59% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADPV or BDGS?

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADPV or BDGS?

ADPV has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between ADPV and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.