PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADME vs. JPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADME vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than JPUS's 11.55% return.


ADME

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.45%
YTD
9.81%
6M
8.93%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

JPUS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.45%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.59%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADME vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
9.81%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-6.05%17.58%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
11.55%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and JPUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2016

0.74

The correlation between ADME and JPUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ADME vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADME
JPUS

Technology

35.2%
11.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
8.0%

Communication Services

11.3%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
11.5%

Industrials

8.3%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
11.3%

Energy

3.6%
7.3%

Utilities

2.3%
9.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
10.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
6.8%

Technology

ADME
35.2%
JPUS
11.6%

Financial Services

ADME
11.9%
JPUS
8.0%

Communication Services

ADME
11.3%
JPUS
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ADME
10.2%
JPUS
8.6%

Healthcare

ADME
8.4%
JPUS
11.5%

Industrials

ADME
8.3%
JPUS
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

ADME
5.0%
JPUS
11.3%

Energy

ADME
3.6%
JPUS
7.3%

Utilities

ADME
2.3%
JPUS
9.5%

Real Estate

ADME
2.0%
JPUS
10.5%

Basic Materials

ADME
1.7%
JPUS
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADME vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADME vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMEJPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.02

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

12.12

+0.12

ADME vs. JPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the JPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and JPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMEJPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.00

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.65

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.72

-0.09

Drawdowns

ADME vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum JPUS drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and JPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMEJPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-38.69%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-6.90%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-15.96%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-19.04%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.01%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-3.83%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.72%

-0.01%

Volatility

ADME vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMEJPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.90%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

7.58%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

10.41%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

14.50%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

16.76%

-2.36%

ADME vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADME vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than JPUS's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.37%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%0.00%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.04%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADME and JPUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADME has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to JPUS (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADME dropped -27.49% vs JPUS's -38.69%.

On 5-year performance, JPUS leads with 9.40% vs 8.23% for ADME. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.

ADME is categorized as Hedge Fund, while JPUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADME and 0.18% for JPUS.

ADME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADME and JPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer