ADME vs. JANB
ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADME is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while JANB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. ADME is passively managed, while JANB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ADME charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
ADME vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.08% return.
ADME
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 20.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADME vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 9.81% | 0.90% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.08% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADME and JANB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADME vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
ADME
JANB
ADME vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.97 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
ADME vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -6.52% | -20.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.22% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -1.14% | -6.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | — | — |
Volatility
ADME vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 7.41% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 7.41% | +5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 7.41% | +6.99% |
ADME vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADME vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ADME and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.
ADME has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.
ADME is categorized as Hedge Fund, while JANB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADME and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for ADME and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer