PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited (CHOLAFIN.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ADMA is traded in USD, while CHOLAFIN.NS is traded in INR. To make them comparable, the CHOLAFIN.NS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADMA achieves a -54.99% return, which is significantly lower than CHOLAFIN.NS's -12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ADMA has underperformed CHOLAFIN.NS with an annualized return of 1.84%, while CHOLAFIN.NS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.54% annualized return.


ADMA

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-54.99%
6M
-58.49%
1Y
-61.99%
3Y*
27.09%
5Y*
35.16%
10Y*
1.84%

CHOLAFIN.NS

1D
7.82%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-12.92%
6M
-13.94%
1Y
-10.59%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
16.75%
10Y*
24.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-54.99%6.36%279.42%16.49%175.18%-27.69%-51.25%67.36%-25.55%-37.30%
CHOLAFIN.NS
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited
-12.92%36.88%-8.30%73.77%25.39%32.15%24.43%31.31%0.38%66.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ADMA and CHOLAFIN.NS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.04

The correlation between ADMA and CHOLAFIN.NS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CHOLAFIN.NS
CHOLAFIN.NS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CHOLAFIN.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHOLAFIN.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHOLAFIN.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CHOLAFIN.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHOLAFIN.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited (CHOLAFIN.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADMACHOLAFIN.NSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.97

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.38

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.95

-0.91

-1.04

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADMA Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the CHOLAFIN.NS Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADMA and CHOLAFIN.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADMA drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than CHOLAFIN.NS's maximum drawdown of -83.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADMA and CHOLAFIN.NS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMACHOLAFIN.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.28%

-83.98%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.48%

-28.22%

-35.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.99%

-30.67%

-38.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.99%

-30.67%

-38.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.11%

-66.33%

-19.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.50%

-17.66%

-48.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-16.47%

-36.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.85%

11.81%

+22.04%

Volatility

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) is 9.74%, while Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited (CHOLAFIN.NS) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that ADMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHOLAFIN.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMACHOLAFIN.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

12.20%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.54%

27.89%

+17.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.60%

34.20%

+20.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.47%

34.85%

+24.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.03%

41.98%

+27.05%

Dividends

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Dividend Comparison

ADMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHOLAFIN.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHOLAFIN.NS
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited
0.13%0.12%0.17%0.16%0.28%0.38%0.18%8.35%12.90%10.58%11.88%13.63%

Financials

ADMA vs. CHOLAFIN.NS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ADMA values in USD, CHOLAFIN.NS values in INR

Frequently Asked Questions


ADMA and CHOLAFIN.NS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADMA and CHOLAFIN.NS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer