PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADGAX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Core Opportunities Fund (ADGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADGAX achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than FZALX's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ADGAX has underperformed FZALX with an annualized return of 13.32%, while FZALX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.59% annualized return.


ADGAX

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.16%
YTD
5.48%
6M
4.95%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
13.32%

FZALX

1D
-1.02%
1M
1.56%
YTD
9.41%
6M
11.10%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
16.06%
10Y*
16.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADGAX
AB Core Opportunities Fund
5.48%17.36%22.49%20.93%-15.73%24.34%12.97%26.94%-2.89%22.46%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
9.41%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ADGAX and FZALX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.91

The correlation between ADGAX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADGAX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADGAX
ADGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ADGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ADGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Opportunities Fund (ADGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADGAXFZALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

3.37

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

15.30

-8.32

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADGAX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADGAXFZALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.52

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.97

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.92

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.85

-0.34

Drawdowns

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADGAX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADGAXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.65%

-35.23%

-18.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-8.99%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.08%

-18.49%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-23.25%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.10%

-35.23%

+4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.34%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-3.77%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.98%

+1.02%

Volatility

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

AB Core Opportunities Fund (ADGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADGAXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.89%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.10%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

12.02%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

16.71%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

18.14%

-0.45%

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADGAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADGAX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

ADGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.84%, more than FZALX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADGAX
AB Core Opportunities Fund
14.84%15.65%10.29%4.69%10.73%15.80%4.24%5.63%17.66%11.05%4.72%7.20%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.69%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ADGAX and FZALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ADGAX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FZALX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADGAX dropped -53.65% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADGAX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer