PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADFI vs. KDRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADFI vs. KDRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADFI vs. KDRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ADFI
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
-0.48%5.61%0.51%6.70%-11.66%-0.17%
KDRN
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
0.63%4.65%1.30%10.06%-12.05%0.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADFI achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than KDRN's 0.63% return.


ADFI

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
0.37%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*

KDRN

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.23%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADFI vs. KDRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADFI has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KDRN's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ADFI vs. KDRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADFI
ADFI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ADFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ADFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

KDRN
KDRN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KDRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
KDRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADFI vs. KDRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADFIKDRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

0.45

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

0.65

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.70

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.70

1.61

+2.09

ADFI vs. KDRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the KDRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADFI and KDRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADFIKDRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.45

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.12

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ADFI and KDRN is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ADFI vs. KDRN - Dividend Comparison

ADFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than KDRN's 3.13% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ADFI
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.25%3.30%3.17%2.90%1.60%0.80%0.50%
KDRN
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
3.13%2.54%2.83%2.84%2.11%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ADFI vs. KDRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADFI drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than KDRN's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADFI and KDRN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADFIKDRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-15.29%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-3.32%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-1.39%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-4.92%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.43%

-0.58%

Volatility

ADFI vs. KDRN - Volatility Comparison

Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) at 0.77%. This indicates that ADFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KDRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADFIKDRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

0.77%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

2.75%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60%

4.52%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.18%

6.73%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

6.73%

-0.79%