ADDS vs. USMF
ADDS (Hedgeye Index Adds ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ADDS is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while USMF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. ADDS is actively managed, while USMF is passively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ADDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
ADDS vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ADDS
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
USMF
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $300.75K | $267.26K | $427.68K | |
| $831.84K | $2.43M | $1.82M |
ADDS vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF | -1.41% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADDS and USMF is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADDS vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
ADDS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USMF
ADDS vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADDS | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADDS vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADDS drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADDS and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADDS | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -36.24% | +25.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.69% | -2.51% | -8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -4.12% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
ADDS vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADDS | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.67% | 11.50% | +28.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 14.37% | +25.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 16.95% | +22.72% |
ADDS vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADDS vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
ADDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADDS and USMF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ADDS.
USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for ADDS.
ADDS is categorized as Multi-factor, while USMF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ADDS and 0.28% for USMF.
Find the right allocation for ADDS and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer