ADBG vs. BLSG
ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ADBG vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADBG achieves a -73.48% return, which is significantly lower than BLSG's -69.13% return.
ADBG
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -39.24%
- YTD
- -73.48%
- 6M
- -74.65%
- 1Y
- -79.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLSG
- 1D
- 8.70%
- 1M
- -53.10%
- YTD
- -69.13%
- 6M
- -78.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADBG vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -73.48% | -5.55% |
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -69.13% | -58.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADBG and BLSG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADBG vs. BLSG — Risk / Return Rank
ADBG
BLSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADBG vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADBG | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADBG vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADBG drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -88.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBG and BLSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADBG | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.90% | -88.78% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.90% | -87.65% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -61.64% | +18.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.82% | — | — |
Volatility
ADBG vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADBG | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.28% | 146.49% | -77.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.78% | 146.49% | -77.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.78% | 146.49% | -77.71% |
ADBG vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ADBG and BLSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ADBG vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ADBG nor BLSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADBG and BLSG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ADBG and BLSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
ADBG and BLSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for ADBG and BLSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer