ADBE vs. GLW
ADBE (Adobe Inc) and GLW (Corning Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ADBE in Software - Infrastructure, GLW in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, ADBE returned 7.72%/yr vs 27.57%/yr for GLW. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ADBE vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADBE achieves a -41.71% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 105.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ADBE has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 7.72%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 27.57% annualized return.
ADBE
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -17.60%
- YTD
- -41.71%
- 6M
- -42.76%
- 1Y
- -47.91%
- 3Y*
- -24.76%
- 5Y*
- -17.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
GLW
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 105.36%
- 6M
- 103.59%
- 1Y
- 265.24%
- 3Y*
- 79.90%
- 5Y*
- 36.42%
- 10Y*
- 27.57%
ADBE vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADBE Adobe Inc | -41.71% | -21.29% | -25.46% | 77.28% | -40.65% | 13.38% | 51.64% | 45.78% | 29.10% | 70.22% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 105.36% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADBE and GLW is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 1986 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ADBE and GLW shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ADBE:
$82.02B
GLW:
$154.61B
ADBE:
$17.42
GLW:
$2.10
ADBE:
11.71
GLW:
85.36
ADBE:
0.83
GLW:
2.07
ADBE:
3.36
GLW:
9.47
ADBE:
7.12
GLW:
13.09
ADBE:
$25.20B
GLW:
$16.32B
ADBE:
$22.46B
GLW:
$5.93B
ADBE:
$9.68B
GLW:
$3.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADBE vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank
ADBE
GLW
ADBE vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adobe Inc (ADBE) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADBE | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.60 | -0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.03 | 11.23 | -12.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.99 | 35.65 | -37.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADBE vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADBE drawdown since its inception was -79.89%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBE and GLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADBE | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.89% | -99.02% | +19.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.21% | -23.01% | -26.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.86% | -27.57% | -40.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.36% | -34.52% | -35.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.36% | -48.80% | -21.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.36% | -13.83% | -56.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -50.50% | +24.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.31% | 7.23% | +20.08% |
Volatility
ADBE vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Adobe Inc (ADBE) is 16.64%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 24.91%. This indicates that ADBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADBE | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | 24.91% | -8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.17% | 50.66% | -21.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.08% | 56.33% | -21.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 35.81% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 33.86% | +0.62% |
Dividends
ADBE vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
ADBE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADBE Adobe Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.63% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
Financials
ADBE vs. GLW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adobe Inc and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADBE vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison
ADBE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
ADBE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
ADBE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADBE and GLW have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (24.91%) compared to ADBE (16.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADBE dropped -79.89% vs GLW's -99.02%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.58 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADBE and GLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer