PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADAM vs. SACH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADAM vs. SACH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADAM achieves a 72.44% return, which is significantly lower than SACH's 81.93% return.


ADAM

1D
1.11%
1M
37.10%
YTD
72.44%
6M
73.87%
1Y
105.72%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
4.54%

SACH

1D
-2.26%
1M
49.20%
YTD
81.93%
6M
81.93%
1Y
86.96%
3Y*
-7.13%
5Y*
-8.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADAM vs. SACH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
72.44%36.49%-19.27%-5.45%-20.80%10.70%-36.23%20.32%8.95%6.18%
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
81.93%-9.17%-60.54%29.48%-35.83%52.67%7.94%19.39%15.66%-14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ADAM and SACH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between ADAM and SACH has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADAM:

$840.51M

SACH:

$43.40M

EPS

ADAM:

$1.70

SACH:

-$0.04

PS Ratio

ADAM:

1.17

SACH:

1.29

PB Ratio

ADAM:

0.92

SACH:

0.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADAM:

$713.66M

SACH:

$33.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADAM:

$546.72M

SACH:

$32.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADAM:

$477.31M

SACH:

$18.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADAM vs. SACH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADAM
ADAM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ADAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ADAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SACH
SACH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SACH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SACH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SACH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SACH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SACH Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADAM vs. SACH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADAMSACHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

3.18

+3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.77

6.93

+12.84

ADAM vs. SACH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the SACH Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADAM and SACH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADAM vs. SACH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADAM drawdown since its inception was -97.94%, which is greater than SACH's maximum drawdown of -80.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADAM and SACH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADAMSACHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.94%

-80.30%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-27.54%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.20%

-78.73%

+36.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.26%

-80.30%

+23.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.82%

-50.25%

-9.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.65%

-29.78%

-43.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

12.59%

-7.22%

Volatility

ADAM vs. SACH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) is 29.43%, while Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) has a volatility of 67.91%. This indicates that ADAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SACH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADAMSACHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.43%

67.91%

-38.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.88%

76.52%

-38.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.89%

104.68%

-58.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.69%

61.04%

-23.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.40%

58.09%

-8.69%

Dividends

ADAM vs. SACH - Dividend Comparison

ADAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.33%, less than SACH's 71.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
35.33%11.78%13.20%14.07%15.62%10.75%6.10%12.84%13.58%12.97%14.55%19.14%
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
71.74%19.23%17.78%12.83%15.76%8.22%11.54%8.29%15.60%6.60%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ADAM vs. SACH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adamas Trust, Inc and Sachem Capital Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
229.24M
0
(ADAM) Total Revenue
(SACH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADAM and SACH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SACH has higher volatility (67.91%) compared to ADAM (29.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADAM dropped -97.94% vs SACH's -80.30%.

ADAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADAM and SACH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer