ACYS vs. NIHI
ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and NIHI (NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for NIHI.
Performance
ACYS vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIHI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.10% |
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACYS and NIHI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACYS vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACYS vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum NIHI drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and NIHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACYS | NIHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -10.88% | +10.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.57% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -2.18% | +2.04% |
Volatility
ACYS vs. NIHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACYS | NIHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 14.89% | -11.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.36% | 14.89% | -11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.36% | 14.89% | -11.53% |
ACYS vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACYS vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison
ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than NIHI's 8.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 8.63% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACYS and NIHI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIHI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIHI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.68% for NIHI.
Find the right allocation for ACYS and NIHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer