ACYS vs. NFTY
ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACYS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a India Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. ACYS is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
ACYS vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- -7.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
ACYS vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.85% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACYS and NFTY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACYS vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFTY
ACYS vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACYS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACYS vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACYS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -47.67% | +47.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -14.78% | +14.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -9.62% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.70% | — |
Volatility
ACYS vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACYS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 14.70% | -11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 17.41% | -14.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 20.66% | -17.31% |
ACYS vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACYS vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than NFTY's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACYS and NFTY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.
ACYS is categorized as Derivative Income, while NFTY is India Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.80% for NFTY.
Find the right allocation for ACYS and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer