PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACYS vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACYS vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACYS

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.60%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
-8.63%
1M
-16.83%
6M
190.97%
YTD
210.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACYS vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACYS and ARMW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACYS vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACYS vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACYS vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACYSARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-48.47%

+47.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-37.58%

+37.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-25.45%

+25.31%

Volatility

ACYS vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACYSARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

94.51%

-91.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

94.51%

-91.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

94.51%

-91.16%

ACYS vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACYS vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than ARMW's 40.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACYS and ARMW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 40.23%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACYS and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer