ACYS vs. ARMW
ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
ACYS vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- -8.63%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- 6M
- 190.97%
- YTD
- 210.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.85% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 58.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACYS and ARMW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACYS vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACYS vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACYS | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -48.47% | +47.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -37.58% | +37.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -25.45% | +25.31% |
Volatility
ACYS vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACYS | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 94.51% | -91.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 94.51% | -91.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 94.51% | -91.16% |
ACYS vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACYS vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than ARMW's 40.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% | 0.00% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 40.23% | 16.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACYS and ARMW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 40.23%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for ACYS and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer