ACYN vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ACYN (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ACYN is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. ACYN is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACYN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

ACYN vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACYN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLN

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 13.54%
• YTD: 52.00%
• 6M: 46.53%
• 1Y: 117.87%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 17.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACYN vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	4.83%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	31.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ACYN and QCLN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026	0.23

Return for Risk

ACYN vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACYN vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACYN	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.75	0.20	+2.55

Drawdowns

ACYN vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYN drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYN and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACYN	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-76.18%	+74.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.47%	+21.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-43.44%	+43.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACYN	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.88%	34.68%	-27.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	37.96%	-31.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.88%	34.90%	-28.02%

ACYN vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACYN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACYN vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

ACYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACYN and QCLN in my portfolio?

ACYN and QCLN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACYN or QCLN?

On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACYN or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACYN or QCLN?

ACYN has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between ACYN and QCLN?

ACYN is categorized as Derivative Income, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYN and 0.60% for QCLN.