ACWV vs. IWMO.MI
ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and IWMO.MI (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while IWMO.MI is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWV returned 7.48%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for IWMO.MI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWMO.MI.
Performance
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ACWV is traded in USD, while IWMO.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWMO.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than IWMO.MI's 21.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has underperformed IWMO.MI with an annualized return of 7.48%, while IWMO.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
ACWV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
IWMO.MI
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 29.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.88% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 3.04% | 21.04% | -1.42% | 18.57% |
IWMO.MI iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) | 21.08% | 21.97% | 31.27% | 11.32% | -18.70% | 14.97% | 28.52% | 28.37% | -4.32% | 32.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWV and IWMO.MI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ACWV and IWMO.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI — Risk / Return Rank
ACWV
IWMO.MI
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWV | IWMO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.92 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 12.28 | -9.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum IWMO.MI drawdown of -31.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and IWMO.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWV | IWMO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -31.52% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | -11.57% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.56% | -19.85% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -29.89% | +11.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | -31.52% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -0.79% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -6.47% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.76% | -0.66% |
Volatility
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 2.18%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMO.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWV | IWMO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 6.15% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.63% | 15.30% | -9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 17.89% | -10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 18.39% | -8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 18.23% | -5.93% |
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMO.MI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ACWV vs. IWMO.MI - Dividend Comparison
ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while IWMO.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
IWMO.MI iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWV and IWMO.MI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWMO.MI.
ACWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWMO.MI is Momentum. ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while IWMO.MI tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.25% for IWMO.MI.
Find the right allocation for ACWV and IWMO.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer