PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWV vs. INFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWV vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACWV

1D
0.82%
1M
0.81%
6M
2.67%
YTD
3.64%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
6.99%

INFR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWV vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
3.64%11.04%11.38%8.23%-0.25%
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.41%24.00%-6.23%5.20%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWV and INFR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between ACWV and INFR has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ACWV vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWV
INFR

Technology

25.8%

-

Financial Services

13.2%

-

Healthcare

13.0%

-

Communication Services

11.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.8%

-

Industrials

8.1%
27.5%

Utilities

7.3%
68.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Real Estate

0.6%
4.1%

Technology

ACWV
25.8%
INFR

-

Financial Services

ACWV
13.2%
INFR

-

Healthcare

ACWV
13.0%
INFR

-

Communication Services

ACWV
11.9%
INFR

-

Consumer Defensive

ACWV
9.8%
INFR

-

Industrials

ACWV
8.1%
INFR
27.5%

Utilities

ACWV
7.3%
INFR
68.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWV
5.1%
INFR

-

Energy

ACWV
3.7%
INFR

-

Basic Materials

ACWV
1.5%
INFR

-

Real Estate

ACWV
0.6%
INFR
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWV vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV
ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWV vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWVINFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

ACWV vs. INFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWVINFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

Volatility

ACWV vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWVINFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

ACWV vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWV vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
1.94%2.09%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.71%2.52%2.36%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWV and INFR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.

ACWV is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR is Energy Equities. ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.59% for INFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWV and INFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer