ACWV vs. BUFX
ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
ACWV vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 3.84% return.
ACWV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWV vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.23% | 1.99% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 3.84% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWV and BUFX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWV vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
ACWV
BUFX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWV vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWV vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -2.87% | -25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -0.59% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -0.24% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility
ACWV vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.82% | 4.05% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.22% | 4.05% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 4.05% | +8.24% |
ACWV vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWV vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWV and BUFX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
ACWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for ACWV and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer