PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWU.L vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 8.08% return.


ACWU.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.86%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.61%

SPYI

1D
0.33%
1M
3.47%
YTD
8.08%
6M
8.61%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
11.52%22.66%17.03%21.98%-4.56%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
8.08%16.67%19.03%18.09%-2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWU.L and SPYI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

0.44

Over the past year, ACWU.L and SPYI have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWU.L
SPYI

Technology

29.3%
35.5%

Financial Services

16.2%
11.8%

Industrials

10.9%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.9%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

ACWU.L
29.3%
SPYI
35.5%

Financial Services

ACWU.L
16.2%
SPYI
11.8%

Industrials

ACWU.L
10.9%
SPYI
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWU.L
9.3%
SPYI
10.1%

Communication Services

ACWU.L
9.0%
SPYI
11.2%

Healthcare

ACWU.L
8.1%
SPYI
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

ACWU.L
5.0%
SPYI
4.9%

Energy

ACWU.L
4.2%
SPYI
3.5%

Basic Materials

ACWU.L
3.7%
SPYI
1.8%

Utilities

ACWU.L
2.6%
SPYI
2.3%

Real Estate

ACWU.L
1.8%
SPYI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWU.L vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWU.L
ACWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWU.LSPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.02

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

15.73

-2.37

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWU.L and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWU.LSPYIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.42

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.22

-0.32

Drawdowns

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWU.LSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-16.47%

-17.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-7.72%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.17%

-16.47%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.17%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-1.80%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.48%

+0.64%

Volatility

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 1.78%. This indicates that ACWU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWU.LSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

1.78%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

7.42%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

9.62%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

12.91%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

12.91%

+8.54%

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWU.L vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

ACWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.60%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
11.60%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWU.L and SPYI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWU.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWU.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYI.

ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.68% for SPYI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer