ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L
ACWU.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACWU.L returned 11.12%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for CHRG.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.
Performance
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ACWU.L is traded in USD, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 33.17% return.
ACWU.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 33.17%
- 6M
- 31.20%
- 1Y
- 103.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 11.52% | 22.66% | 17.03% | 21.98% | -18.69% | 19.16% | 25.70% |
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 33.17% | 55.18% | -13.38% | -4.90% | -27.75% | 13.85% | 85.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWU.L and CHRG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between ACWU.L and CHRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Financial Services
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
-
Industrials
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Communication Services
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
-
Healthcare
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Energy
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Basic Materials
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Utilities
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
Real Estate
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWU.L
CHRG.L
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWU.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.35 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 6.55 | +6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWU.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.96 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.15 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.52 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and CHRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWU.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -55.49% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -30.81% | +21.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.17% | -40.33% | +23.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -55.49% | +29.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -3.73% | +2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -25.20% | +20.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 15.78% | -13.66% |
Volatility
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) is 3.88%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that ACWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWU.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 10.69% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 20.23% | -10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 52.78% | -40.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 31.81% | -12.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 31.47% | -10.02% |
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWU.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWU.L nor CHRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWU.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.
ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and CHRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer