ACWI vs. TOK
ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) and TOK (iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index, while TOK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI Kokusai Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWI returned 13.02%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for TOK. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWI charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TOK.
Performance
ACWI vs. TOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than TOK's 8.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWI having a 13.02% annualized return and TOK not far ahead at 13.63%.
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
TOK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
ACWI vs. TOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 10.59% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
TOK iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | 8.52% | 20.83% | 19.52% | 24.76% | -17.93% | 23.84% | 15.06% | 30.05% | -7.83% | 22.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI and TOK is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ACWI and TOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACWI vs. TOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWI
TOK
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWI
TOK
Financial Services
ACWI
TOK
Industrials
ACWI
TOK
Consumer Cyclical
ACWI
TOK
Communication Services
ACWI
TOK
Healthcare
ACWI
TOK
Consumer Defensive
ACWI
TOK
Energy
ACWI
TOK
Basic Materials
ACWI
TOK
Utilities
ACWI
TOK
Real Estate
ACWI
TOK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWI vs. TOK — Risk / Return Rank
ACWI
TOK
ACWI vs. TOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWI | TOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.51 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 11.28 | +0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWI vs. TOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TOK drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and TOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWI | TOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | -56.18% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.73% | -9.07% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -16.23% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -25.86% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.53% | -34.82% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -1.90% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -8.51% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.02% | +0.20% |
Volatility
ACWI vs. TOK - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) at 4.34%. This indicates that ACWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWI | TOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.34% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 9.96% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 12.40% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 15.99% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 17.16% | -0.02% |
ACWI vs. TOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than TOK's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWI vs. TOK - Dividend Comparison
ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than TOK's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.40% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
TOK iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 3.55% | 1.66% | 1.52% | 2.12% | 2.74% | 2.60% | 2.56% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ACWI and TOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACWI has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to TOK (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs TOK's -56.18%.
On 10-year performance, TOK leads with 13.63% vs 13.02% for ACWI. On fees, TOK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TOK has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TOK has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.27% for TOK.
ACWI is categorized as Global Equities, while TOK is Large Cap Growth Equities. ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index, while TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.25% for TOK.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWI and TOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer