PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ACWI.L is traded in GBP, while VHYD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VHYD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI.L achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than VHYD.L's 12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI.L has underperformed VHYD.L with an annualized return of -30.84%, while VHYD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.


ACWI.L

1D
1.75%
1M
0.47%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.29%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
-58.35%
10Y*
-30.84%

VHYD.L

1D
2.10%
1M
2.13%
YTD
12.90%
6M
13.84%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
10.58%14.32%19.66%15.59%-8.59%-99.12%15.70%26.48%-9.57%23.83%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
12.90%17.98%11.23%5.86%5.79%18.96%-3.24%16.16%-6.48%9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI.L and VHYD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.62

The correlation between ACWI.L and VHYD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWI.L
VHYD.L

Technology

29.2%
7.7%

Financial Services

16.5%
28.6%

Industrials

10.9%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.0%

Communication Services

9.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.0%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
8.7%

Energy

4.3%
9.4%

Basic Materials

3.6%
5.1%

Utilities

2.7%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.9%

Technology

ACWI.L
29.2%
VHYD.L
7.7%

Financial Services

ACWI.L
16.5%
VHYD.L
28.6%

Industrials

ACWI.L
10.9%
VHYD.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWI.L
9.3%
VHYD.L
7.0%

Communication Services

ACWI.L
9.0%
VHYD.L
3.5%

Healthcare

ACWI.L
8.0%
VHYD.L
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

ACWI.L
4.9%
VHYD.L
8.7%

Energy

ACWI.L
4.3%
VHYD.L
9.4%

Basic Materials

ACWI.L
3.6%
VHYD.L
5.1%

Utilities

ACWI.L
2.7%
VHYD.L
5.7%

Real Estate

ACWI.L
1.7%
VHYD.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWI.LVHYD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.54

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

4.16

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.37

15.36

+0.02

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI.L and VHYD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI.L drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than VHYD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI.L and VHYD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWI.LVHYD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.37%

-29.43%

-69.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-6.91%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-12.99%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.37%

-12.99%

-86.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.37%

-29.43%

-69.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.82%

0.00%

-98.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-3.69%

-28.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.88%

-0.09%

Volatility

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) at 3.26%. This indicates that ACWI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWI.LVHYD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.26%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.44%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

10.24%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.28%

12.27%

+36.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.83%

14.78%

+21.05%

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYD.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWI.L vs. VHYD.L - Dividend Comparison

ACWI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.46%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWI.L and VHYD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYD.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYD.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

ACWI.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VHYD.L is Dividend. ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ACWI.L and 0.29% for VHYD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI.L and VHYD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer