ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L
ACWI.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF) and ACWU.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from State Street and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWI.L returned 13.66%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for ACWU.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWI.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACWU.L.
Performance
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ACWI.L is traded in GBP, while ACWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWI.L having a 11.87% return and ACWU.L slightly higher at 12.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWI.L having a 13.66% annualized return and ACWU.L not far behind at 13.52%.
ACWI.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 30.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
ACWU.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI.L SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF | 11.87% | 14.32% | 19.66% | 15.59% | -8.59% | 20.28% | 11.89% | 21.92% | -4.58% | 12.93% |
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 12.16% | 14.26% | 18.72% | 15.50% | -8.94% | 20.24% | 10.28% | 24.51% | -5.15% | 14.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI.L and ACWU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, ACWI.L and ACWU.L have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Financial Services
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Industrials
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Consumer Cyclical
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Communication Services
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Healthcare
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Consumer Defensive
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Energy
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Basic Materials
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Utilities
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Real Estate
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWI.L
ACWU.L
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWI.L | ACWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.47 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 4.27 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 16.26 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWI.L | ACWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.49 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 1.09 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.14 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWU.L drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI.L and ACWU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWI.L | ACWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -25.62% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -7.02% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -18.33% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -18.33% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.44% | -25.62% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.33% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -3.47% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.85% | -0.11% |
Volatility
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) is 2.89%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that ACWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWI.L | ACWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 3.81% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 9.44% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 12.08% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 16.62% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 19.08% | -4.69% |
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWU.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWI.L nor ACWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWI.L and ACWU.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWI.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWI.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ACWI.L and 0.45% for ACWU.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWI.L and ACWU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer