PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ACWI.L is traded in GBP, while ACWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWI.L having a 11.87% return and ACWU.L slightly higher at 12.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWI.L having a 13.66% annualized return and ACWU.L not far behind at 13.52%.


ACWI.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.87%
6M
12.47%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
13.66%

ACWU.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.70%
YTD
12.16%
6M
12.89%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
11.87%14.32%19.66%15.59%-8.59%20.28%11.89%21.92%-4.58%12.93%
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
12.16%14.26%18.72%15.50%-8.94%20.24%10.28%24.51%-5.15%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI.L and ACWU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.54

Over the past year, ACWI.L and ACWU.L have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWI.L
ACWU.L

Technology

29.2%
29.3%

Financial Services

16.5%
16.2%

Industrials

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.3%

Communication Services

9.0%
9.0%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Energy

4.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.7%

Utilities

2.7%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

ACWI.L
29.2%
ACWU.L
29.3%

Financial Services

ACWI.L
16.5%
ACWU.L
16.2%

Industrials

ACWI.L
10.9%
ACWU.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWI.L
9.3%
ACWU.L
9.3%

Communication Services

ACWI.L
9.0%
ACWU.L
9.0%

Healthcare

ACWI.L
8.0%
ACWU.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

ACWI.L
4.9%
ACWU.L
5.0%

Energy

ACWI.L
4.3%
ACWU.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

ACWI.L
3.6%
ACWU.L
3.7%

Utilities

ACWI.L
2.7%
ACWU.L
2.6%

Real Estate

ACWI.L
1.7%
ACWU.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWU.L
ACWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWI.LACWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.47

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

4.27

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

16.26

+1.21

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI.L and ACWU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWI.LACWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.49

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.09

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

1.25

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.14

-0.34

Drawdowns

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWU.L drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI.L and ACWU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWI.LACWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-25.62%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-7.02%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-18.33%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-18.33%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.44%

-25.62%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.33%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-3.47%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.85%

-0.11%

Volatility

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) is 2.89%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that ACWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWI.LACWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.81%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

9.44%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

12.08%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

16.62%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

19.08%

-4.69%

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWU.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWI.L vs. ACWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWI.L nor ACWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWI.L and ACWU.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWI.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWI.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ACWI.L and 0.45% for ACWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI.L and ACWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer