PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and SPX5.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while SPX5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 15.42%/yr for SPX5.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPX5.L.

Performance

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ACWD.L is traded in USD, while SPX5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SPX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWD.L achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPX5.L's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L has underperformed SPX5.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while SPX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.

ACWD.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.34%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.24%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.77%

SPX5.L

1D
-0.54%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.22%
6M
10.95%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF		11.57%22.83%17.76%22.27%-18.37%18.77%15.91%25.80%-9.85%24.09%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.22%17.59%25.34%26.07%-18.73%29.78%17.00%31.82%-5.70%22.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWD.L and SPX5.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012

0.83

The correlation between ACWD.L and SPX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ACWD.L
SPX5.L

Technology

29.2%
35.6%

Financial Services

16.5%
11.8%

Industrials

10.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.9%

Technology

ACWD.L
29.2%
SPX5.L
35.6%

Financial Services

ACWD.L
16.5%
SPX5.L
11.8%

Industrials

ACWD.L
10.9%
SPX5.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWD.L
9.3%
SPX5.L
10.1%

Communication Services

ACWD.L
9.0%
SPX5.L
11.2%

Healthcare

ACWD.L
8.0%
SPX5.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

ACWD.L
4.9%
SPX5.L
4.9%

Energy

ACWD.L
4.3%
SPX5.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

ACWD.L
3.6%
SPX5.L
1.8%

Utilities

ACWD.L
2.7%
SPX5.L
2.3%

Real Estate

ACWD.L
1.7%
SPX5.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF

SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Often compared with ACWD.L:
ACWD.L vs. VWRA.LACWD.L vs. ACWIACWD.L vs. SWRD.LACWD.L vs. IWDA.LACWD.L vs. FWRA.LACWD.L vs. WEBN.DEACWD.L vs. IWQU.L
Often compared with SPX5.L:
SPX5.L vs. SPYSPX5.L vs. SPXP.LSPX5.L vs. VUSA.DESPX5.L vs. VUSA.LSPX5.L vs. VOOSPX5.L vs. IUSA.LSPX5.L vs. EQQQ.L

Return for Risk

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ACWD.L
ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ACWD.LSPX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.36
2.54

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.49
3.65

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.25

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

14.01

+0.13

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWD.L and SPX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ACWD.LSPX5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.88

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.96

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.94

-0.21

Drawdowns

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SPX5.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and SPX5.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ACWD.LSPX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-33.47%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.64%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-18.43%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-25.18%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.64%

-33.47%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.54%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-3.72%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.01%

+0.08%

Volatility

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) at 2.47%. This indicates that ACWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ACWD.LSPX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

2.47%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

7.93%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

11.10%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

15.55%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

16.06%

-0.21%

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPX5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ACWD.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison

ACWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.89%0.98%1.04%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.76%1.71%2.36%1.49%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

ACWD.L and SPX5.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ACWD.L.

ACWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPX5.L is S&P 500. ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.09% for SPX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWD.L and SPX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer