PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and ISWD.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - ACWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while ISWD.L tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for ISWD.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISWD.L.

Performance

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ACWD.L is traded in USD, while ISWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWD.L achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than ISWD.L's 20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L has outperformed ISWD.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while ISWD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.

ACWD.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.34%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.24%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.77%

ISWD.L

1D
0.38%
1M
10.08%
YTD
20.09%
6M
21.36%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF		11.57%22.83%17.76%22.27%-18.37%18.77%15.91%25.80%-9.85%24.09%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		20.09%20.00%6.05%23.43%-11.47%22.58%8.33%22.72%-9.25%19.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWD.L and ISWD.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2011

0.83

The correlation between ACWD.L and ISWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ACWD.L
ISWD.L

Technology

29.2%
42.8%

Financial Services

16.5%
0.0%

Industrials

10.9%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
6.9%

Communication Services

9.0%
0.4%

Healthcare

8.0%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.7%

Energy

4.3%
11.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
9.6%

Utilities

2.7%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.2%

Technology

ACWD.L
29.2%
ISWD.L
42.8%

Financial Services

ACWD.L
16.5%
ISWD.L
0.0%

Industrials

ACWD.L
10.9%
ISWD.L
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWD.L
9.3%
ISWD.L
6.9%

Communication Services

ACWD.L
9.0%
ISWD.L
0.4%

Healthcare

ACWD.L
8.0%
ISWD.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

ACWD.L
4.9%
ISWD.L
3.7%

Energy

ACWD.L
4.3%
ISWD.L
11.6%

Basic Materials

ACWD.L
3.6%
ISWD.L
9.6%

Utilities

ACWD.L
2.7%
ISWD.L
1.1%

Real Estate

ACWD.L
1.7%
ISWD.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with ACWD.L:
ACWD.L vs. VWRA.LACWD.L vs. ACWIACWD.L vs. SWRD.LACWD.L vs. IWDA.LACWD.L vs. FWRA.LACWD.L vs. WEBN.DEACWD.L vs. IWQU.L
Often compared with ISWD.L:
ISWD.L vs. IGDA.LISWD.L vs. SPUSISWD.L vs. HLALISWD.L vs. VOOISWD.L vs. SPWOISWD.L vs. UMMAISWD.L vs. HIWS.L

Return for Risk

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ACWD.L
ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ACWD.LISWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.36
2.99

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.49
4.21

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.17

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

18.71

-4.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWD.L and ISWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ACWD.LISWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.99

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.81

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.76

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.52

+0.21

Drawdowns

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum ISWD.L drawdown of -48.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and ISWD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ACWD.LISWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-48.12%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-7.30%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-18.46%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-22.70%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.64%

-33.38%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-4.70%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.02%

+0.07%

Volatility

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ACWD.LISWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

3.95%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

9.67%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

12.63%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

15.46%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

15.67%

+0.18%

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ISWD.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWD.L vs. ISWD.L - Dividend Comparison

ACWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

ACWD.L and ISWD.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.60% for ISWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWD.L and ISWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer