ACVU vs. SDOG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ACVU is actively managed, while SDOG is passively managed. Over the past year, ACVU returned 31.54% vs 31.23% for SDOG. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.

Performance

ACVU vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVU achieves a 16.39% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 20.66% return.

ACVU

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 13.19%
• YTD: 16.39%
• 1Y: 31.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.91%

SDOG

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 14.17%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 1Y: 31.23%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: 9.82%
• ALL TIME*: 11.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	$620.51K	$366.35K	$236.21K
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	$2.77M	$3.32M	$3.60M

ACVU vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	16.39%	14.54%	9.83%	8.16%
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	20.66%	11.12%	14.70%	12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVU and SDOG is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2023	0.83

The correlation between ACVU and SDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACVU vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACVU	SDOG
Financial Services	20.5%	10.3%
Technology	19.0%	11.2%
Healthcare	15.0%	10.5%
Industrials	10.6%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	16.8%
Utilities	6.7%	10.5%
Energy	6.0%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	10.2%
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	9.4%
Basic Materials	1.5%	3.3%

Return for Risk

ACVU vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACVU

ACVU Risk / Return Rank: 93
ACVU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ACVU Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ACVU Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ACVU Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ACVU Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SDOG

SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 94
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACVU vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACVU	SDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.62	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.95	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.46	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	4.85	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.00	16.71	+0.29

ACVU vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVU Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVU and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACVU vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVU drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVU and SDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVU	SDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-43.56%	+30.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-6.24%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.22%	+2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-4.87%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.81%	-0.02%

Volatility

ACVU vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is 2.80%, while ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that ACVU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVU	SDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	4.12%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.63%	8.40%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	11.59%	-0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.27%	15.35%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.27%	18.98%	-6.71%

ACVU vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVU vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than SDOG's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	1.69%	1.97%	3.91%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	3.33%	3.68%	3.86%	4.29%	3.87%	3.62%	3.63%	3.37%	4.03%	3.27%	3.32%	3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVU and SDOG in my portfolio?

ACVU and SDOG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVU or SDOG?

SDOG has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to ACVU (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVU dropped -13.11% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, ACVU or SDOG?

On 1-year performance, ACVU leads with 31.54% vs 31.23% for SDOG. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, ACVU has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVU or SDOG?

Over the 1-year period, ACVU has performed better with a 31.54% return vs 31.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVU or SDOG?

SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACVU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVU or SDOG?

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 1.69% for ACVU.

What is the main difference between ACVU and SDOG?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.36% for SDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACVU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.