ACVU vs. PRF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ACVU is actively managed, while PRF is passively managed. Over the past year, ACVU returned 23.84% vs 32.80% for PRF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.

Performance

ACVU vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 14.79% return.

ACVU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 32.80%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVU vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	11.06%	14.54%	9.83%	8.32%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	14.79%	18.33%	16.73%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVU and PRF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023	0.92

The correlation between ACVU and PRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACVU vs. PRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACVU	PRF
Financial Services	17.9%	15.4%
Technology	16.3%	20.9%
Industrials	11.6%	9.2%
Healthcare	11.4%	11.7%
Communication Services	8.2%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	6.3%
Energy	7.4%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	9.1%
Utilities	6.1%	3.1%
Real Estate	4.0%	2.5%
Basic Materials	2.4%	3.4%

Return for Risk

ACVU vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVU

ACVU Risk / Return Rank: 67
ACVU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACVU Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ACVU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ACVU Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ACVU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 89
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVU vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACVU	PRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.10	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	4.33	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.57	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	5.00	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	20.67	-8.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACVU vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVU Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVU and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACVU	PRF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	3.10	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	0.48	+0.92

Drawdowns

ACVU vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVU drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVU and PRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVU	PRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-60.35%	+47.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-6.59%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.20%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-6.93%	+4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.59%	+0.38%

Volatility

ACVU vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 2.64%. This indicates that ACVU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVU	PRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	2.64%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.22%	7.74%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	10.63%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.30%	15.18%	-2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.30%	17.67%	-5.37%

ACVU vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVU vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than PRF's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	1.77%	1.97%	3.91%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.38%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVU and PRF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ACVU and PRF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACVU or PRF?

ACVU has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to PRF (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVU dropped -13.11% vs PRF's -60.35%.

Which ETF is better, ACVU or PRF?

On 1-year performance, PRF leads with 32.80% vs 23.84% for ACVU. On fees, PRF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVU or PRF?

Over the 1-year period, PRF has performed better with a 32.80% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVU or PRF?

PRF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACVU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVU or PRF?

ACVU has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.

What is the main difference between ACVU and PRF?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.34% for PRF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.