ACVU vs. HTRB
ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and HTRB (Hartford Total Return Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while HTRB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACVU returned 23.84% vs 5.77% for HTRB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HTRB.
Performance
ACVU vs. HTRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACVU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than HTRB's 0.26% return.
ACVU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTRB
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- —
ACVU vs. HTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 11.06% | 14.54% | 9.83% | 8.32% |
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 0.26% | 7.38% | 2.35% | 8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVU and HTRB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.26 |
ACVU vs. HTRB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACVU
HTRB
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
ACVU
HTRB
-
Technology
ACVU
HTRB
-
Industrials
ACVU
HTRB
-
Healthcare
ACVU
HTRB
-
Communication Services
ACVU
HTRB
-
Consumer Defensive
ACVU
HTRB
-
Energy
ACVU
HTRB
Consumer Cyclical
ACVU
HTRB
-
Utilities
ACVU
HTRB
-
Real Estate
ACVU
HTRB
-
Basic Materials
ACVU
HTRB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVU vs. HTRB — Risk / Return Rank
ACVU
HTRB
ACVU vs. HTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVU | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.06 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | 6.09 | +6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVU | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.51 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.40 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
ACVU vs. HTRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVU drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum HTRB drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVU and HTRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVU | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -19.48% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -2.82% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -1.55% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -4.81% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 0.95% | +1.02% |
Volatility
ACVU vs. HTRB - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) at 1.28%. This indicates that ACVU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVU | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 1.28% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 2.73% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 3.85% | +7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 6.12% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 5.57% | +6.73% |
ACVU vs. HTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HTRB's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVU vs. HTRB - Dividend Comparison
ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than HTRB's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 3.91% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.66% | 4.45% | 3.87% | 3.08% | 4.22% | 4.79% | 6.30% | 2.37% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVU and HTRB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACVU has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to HTRB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVU dropped -13.11% vs HTRB's -19.48%.
On 1-year performance, ACVU leads with 23.84% vs 5.77% for HTRB. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HTRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ACVU has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACVU.
HTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 1.77% for ACVU.
ACVU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HTRB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.29% for HTRB.
ACVU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVU and HTRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer