ACVU vs. HFGO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACVU returned 24.79% vs 20.30% for HFGO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HFGO.

Performance

ACVU vs. HFGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVU achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than HFGO's 4.25% return.

ACVU

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 24.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HFGO

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 2.71%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 23.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVU vs. HFGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	12.50%	14.54%	9.83%	8.16%
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF	4.25%	15.52%	40.73%	14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVU and HFGO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2023	0.42

ACVU vs. HFGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACVU	HFGO
Financial Services	18.6%	2.0%
Technology	17.2%	55.3%
Industrials	11.5%	3.6%
Healthcare	11.4%	7.2%
Communication Services	7.6%	19.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	0.5%
Energy	7.0%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	11.8%
Utilities	6.0%	-
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

ACVU vs. HFGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVU

ACVU Risk / Return Rank: 75
ACVU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ACVU Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ACVU Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ACVU Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ACVU Martin Ratio Rank: 74

HFGO

HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 28
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVU vs. HFGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACVU	HFGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.05	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.50	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.19	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	1.11	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	3.50	+9.09

ACVU vs. HFGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVU Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the HFGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVU and HFGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACVU vs. HFGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVU drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum HFGO drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVU and HFGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVU	HFGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-44.64%	+31.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-18.29%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-7.83%	+6.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-15.98%	+14.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	5.82%	-3.85%

Volatility

ACVU vs. HFGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is 3.94%, while Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that ACVU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVU	HFGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	8.43%	-4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	15.45%	-6.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.32%	19.44%	-8.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.37%	26.01%	-13.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.37%	26.01%	-13.64%

ACVU vs. HFGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HFGO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVU vs. HFGO - Dividend Comparison

ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF	1.75%	1.97%	3.91%	2.87%
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVU and HFGO in my portfolio?

ACVU and HFGO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVU or HFGO?

HFGO has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to ACVU (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVU dropped -13.11% vs HFGO's -44.64%.

Which ETF is better, ACVU or HFGO?

On 1-year performance, ACVU leads with 24.79% vs 20.30% for HFGO. On fees, ACVU is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ACVU has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVU or HFGO?

Over the 1-year period, ACVU has performed better with a 24.79% return vs 20.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVU or HFGO?

ACVU is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVU or HFGO?

ACVU has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.

What is the main difference between ACVU and HFGO?

ACVU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HFGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.60% for HFGO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACVU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.