ACVT vs. CVRT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ACVT (Advent Convertible Bond ETF) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACVT returned 8.55% vs 50.79% for CVRT. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACVT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CVRT.

Performance

ACVT vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVT achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 28.31% return.

ACVT

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 4.46%
• YTD: 5.71%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CVRT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -5.29%
• 6M: 21.33%
• YTD: 28.31%
• 1Y: 50.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVT vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACVT Advent Convertible Bond ETF	5.71%	8.04%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	28.31%	32.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVT and CVRT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.52

The correlation between ACVT and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACVT vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVT

ACVT Risk / Return Rank: 51
ACVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ACVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
ACVT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ACVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ACVT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 86
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVT vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACVT	CVRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.20	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.82	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	5.09	-3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	16.96	-10.58

ACVT vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVT and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACVT vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVT drawdown since its inception was -4.81%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVT and CVRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVT	CVRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-20.71%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-10.03%	+5.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-10.03%	+9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-3.17%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	3.00%	-1.66%

Volatility

ACVT vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) is 1.73%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that ACVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVT	CVRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	7.42%	-5.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.79%	18.98%	-14.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.83%	23.25%	-17.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	20.36%	-14.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.78%	20.36%	-14.58%

ACVT vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVT vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

ACVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CVRT's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ACVT Advent Convertible Bond ETF	1.58%	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.54%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVT and CVRT in my portfolio?

ACVT and CVRT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVT or CVRT?

CVRT has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to ACVT (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVT dropped -4.81% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

Which ETF is better, ACVT or CVRT?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 50.79% vs 8.55% for ACVT. On fees, ACVT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ACVT has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVT or CVRT?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 50.79% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVT or CVRT?

ACVT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CVRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVT or CVRT?

ACVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.54% for CVRT.

What is the main difference between ACVT and CVRT?

They also come from different issuers: Advent and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ACVT and 0.69% for CVRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.