ACVF vs. YCS
ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). ACVF is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACVF returned 12.47%/yr vs 23.76%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
ACVF vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACVF having a 9.61% return and YCS slightly lower at 9.35%.
ACVF
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 9.61%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
ACVF vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 9.61% | 13.67% | 20.56% | 23.81% | -15.74% | 28.84% | 14.93% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.35% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVF and YCS is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | -0.02 |
The correlation between ACVF and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVF vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
ACVF
YCS
ACVF vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACVF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.98 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 12.43 | -2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACVF vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -49.56% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -8.30% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -23.05% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -27.32% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | 0.00% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -19.88% | +15.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.65% | -0.70% |
Volatility
ACVF vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.25% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 12.24% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 16.99% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 21.09% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 18.98% | -2.97% |
ACVF vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVF vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVF and YCS have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACVF has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.76% vs 12.47% for ACVF. On fees, ACVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.76% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
ACVF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVF and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer