ACVF vs. SPY
ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. ACVF is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACVF returned 12.39%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ACVF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACVF having a 10.58% return and SPY slightly higher at 10.91%.
ACVF
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
ACVF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 10.58% | 13.67% | 20.56% | 23.81% | -15.74% | 28.84% | 13.79% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVF and SPY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ACVF and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACVF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACVF
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ACVF
SPY
Financial Services
ACVF
SPY
Industrials
ACVF
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ACVF
SPY
Healthcare
ACVF
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ACVF
SPY
Communication Services
ACVF
SPY
Energy
ACVF
SPY
Utilities
ACVF
SPY
Real Estate
ACVF
SPY
Basic Materials
ACVF
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ACVF
SPY
ACVF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.16 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 14.72 | -3.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.38 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.82 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.59 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
ACVF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -55.19% | +30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -8.88% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -18.76% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -24.50% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.70% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -9.05% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.91% | -0.02% |
Volatility
ACVF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.84% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.90% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 11.83% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 17.05% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 17.94% | -1.97% |
ACVF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.53% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ACVF and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACVF has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 12.39% for ACVF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.53% for ACVF.
ACVF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer