ACVF vs. DJUN
ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACVF is actively managed, while DJUN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACVF returned 12.39%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for DJUN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.
Performance
ACVF vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.78% return.
ACVF
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
DJUN
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ACVF vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 10.58% | 13.67% | 20.56% | 23.81% | -15.74% | 28.84% | 13.79% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 3.78% | 9.38% | 13.92% | 17.58% | -6.30% | 6.27% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVF and DJUN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ACVF and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVF vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank
ACVF
DJUN
ACVF vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVF | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.22 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.35 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.50 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.51 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 20.66 | -9.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVF | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.22 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.97 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ACVF vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and DJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVF | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -11.96% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -3.15% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -11.96% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -11.96% | -12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -1.59% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 0.53% | +1.36% |
Volatility
ACVF vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.25%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVF | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 0.25% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 3.55% | +5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 5.04% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 8.52% | +7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 8.06% | +7.91% |
ACVF vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVF vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison
ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.53% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVF and DJUN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACVF has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to DJUN (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs DJUN's -11.96%.
On 5-year performance, ACVF leads with 12.39% vs 8.19% for DJUN. On fees, ACVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACVF has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.85% for DJUN.
DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVF and DJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer