ACUSX vs. QIACX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ACUSX (Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund) and QIACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACUSX returned 6.47%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for QIACX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ACUSX charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QIACX.

Performance

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACUSX having a 8.01% return and QIACX slightly higher at 8.33%.

ACUSX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 5.96%
• YTD: 8.01%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: 13.43%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.03%

QIACX

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 8.37%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 22.32%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 16.60%
• ALL TIME*: 11.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund	8.01%	13.11%	15.45%	17.27%	-21.05%	15.90%
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	8.33%	21.15%	31.07%	23.52%	-14.16%	26.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ACUSX and QIACX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between ACUSX and QIACX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ACUSX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACUSX

ACUSX Risk / Return Rank: 43
ACUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ACUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ACUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ACUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ACUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

QIACX

QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACUSX	QIACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.26	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.85	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.86	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.74	8.04	-1.30

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the QIACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACUSX and QIACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACUSX drawdown since its inception was -96.85%, which is greater than QIACX's maximum drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACUSX and QIACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACUSX	QIACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.85%	-60.11%	-36.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.82%	-8.65%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.85%	-19.41%	-77.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.85%	-23.05%	-73.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.64%	-0.21%	-95.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.61%	-9.24%	-24.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.00%	-0.05%

Volatility

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) is 2.73%, while Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that ACUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACUSX	QIACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	3.12%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	10.04%	-2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	12.78%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,173.92%	17.45%	+1,156.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,132.73%	18.64%	+1,114.09%

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACUSX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACUSX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

ACUSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	4.23%	4.58%	8.65%	1.40%	10.90%	17.44%	3.01%	3.34%	8.60%	0.69%	1.12%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACUSX and QIACX in my portfolio?

ACUSX and QIACX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACUSX or QIACX?

QIACX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to ACUSX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACUSX dropped -96.85% vs QIACX's -60.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.