PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACUSX vs. WTRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) and Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund (WTRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACUSX achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly lower than WTRCX's 8.66% return.


ACUSX

1D
0.73%
1M
0.80%
6M
5.96%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.03%

WTRCX

1D
1.99%
1M
-0.59%
6M
6.98%
YTD
8.66%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
15.65%
ALL TIME*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ACUSX
Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund
8.01%13.11%15.45%17.27%-21.05%15.90%
WTRCX
Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund
8.66%14.15%51.17%22.71%-18.51%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ACUSX and WTRCX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021

0.91

The correlation between ACUSX and WTRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACUSX vs. WTRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACUSX
ACUSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ACUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ACUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

WTRCX
WTRCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
WTRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WTRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) and Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund (WTRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACUSXWTRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.21

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

4.81

+1.94

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the WTRCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACUSX and WTRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACUSX drawdown since its inception was -96.85%, which is greater than WTRCX's maximum drawdown of -54.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACUSX and WTRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACUSXWTRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.85%

-54.41%

-42.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-11.06%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.85%

-27.46%

-69.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.85%

-33.66%

-63.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.64%

-2.24%

-93.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-20.87%

-12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.77%

-0.82%

Volatility

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) is 2.73%, while Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund (WTRCX) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that ACUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACUSXWTRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

4.10%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

12.03%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

14.79%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,173.92%

30.02%

+1,143.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,132.73%

25.11%

+1,107.62%

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACUSX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than WTRCX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACUSX vs. WTRCX - Dividend Comparison

ACUSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACUSX
Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTRCX
Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund
21.07%22.90%36.18%16.84%19.28%15.56%2.66%12.05%18.38%7.10%3.92%7.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACUSX and WTRCX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTRCX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to ACUSX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACUSX dropped -96.85% vs WTRCX's -54.41%.

ACUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACUSX and WTRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer