PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACU2.DE

1D
0.31%
1M
6.00%
YTD
13.23%
6M
13.20%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
14.18%

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ACU2.DE
Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR
13.23%1.61%26.66%22.75%-15.77%38.66%9.40%34.49%-0.79%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%37.82%9.09%34.14%-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ACU2.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.89

The correlation between ACU2.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACU2.DE
ACU2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ACU2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACU2.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACU2.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

Drawdowns

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACU2.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

Volatility

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACU2.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACU2.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACU2.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ACU2.DE
Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACU2.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ACU2.DE.

ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ACU2.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACU2.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer